Comments on: Michael Verdugo NSFW: Rope Rituals

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 08 Jun 2012 03:45:24 +0000

Mike is one shady lady. That queen has a dark side. Beware to all that cross her path. She will fool the unsuspecting.

By: Arianna Ovalle

Arianna Ovalle — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:39:04 +0000

Mikey outed himself. He used to trick online on Adam4Adam and his profile was questionable. First, he sold himself as a “bottom”, who liked to be tied up by older men. So, if there is anyone to blame it is himself.

By: Lee

Lee — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:03:30 +0000

WOW!! Michael WAS on Design Star but I didn’t even recognize him or the name from this video. You are so right though, queens can be VERY messy and drama-filled so I avoid them at ALL COST! So don’t lump all gays into that category. It’s mostly the “queens.”

By: Yaimel

Yaimel — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:22:51 +0000

Mikey Verdugo was outed in the website GAY.com when he was a participant on HGTV design start…A lot of hating people started writing about him on gay.com and criticizing him and trashing him for not being openly gay Many gay people were not voting and supporting him for never saying on the show that he was gay.This is something I really hate about the gay community if you openly gay they support you 100% but if you choose to stay in the closet they will destroy you with vengeance…

By: kadykianus

kadykianus — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:47:42 +0000

This case – it’s bullshit. Michael Verdugo is not guilty. He is a very good-looking guy, he was probably a good police officer and he is gay who knows what is a good sex. His movie “Rope rituals” is so hot! Look at him. Every policeman should look like him.

By: Kasnar

Kasnar — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:35:30 +0000

I’m wondering how the police department even learned of this past adventure of Michael Verdugo. I know we’re in the internet age but he’s barely recognizable from 11 years ago. I suspect some jilted and/or envious queen outed him. I have a feeling that when he was asked if it was, in fact, him in the video, he didn’t deny it or back down. He could have denied it was him — provided he had used an alias – and left it at that. I don’t know the stated grounds for why the police department would have issues with an adult website. It is supposed to be restricted to adults who access the site and nothing illegal transpired. Perhaps, it’s public relations issue. I wonder how I would respond if such a hot police officer pulled me over. I might try to get arrested.

By: Rob

Rob — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:22:59 +0000

Well…I’m posting my reactions to this WAY LATE as I’ve JUST learned that Mikey Verdugo was once in a gay porn feature. When some people are young, they are more daring and adventurous. Sometimes, they don’t really stop and think of the consequences that might come, later on down the pike. Do we, then, punish them for what they did a dozen or so years ago…particularly when IT’S REALLY NOBODY’S BUSINESS what and individual does with his or her body? I think that there is definitely a lot of gay prejudice on the part of the Mr. Verdugo’s police department. I believe they would probably have grounds to fire him and deny him the ability to be reinstated IF the videotape had been produced WHILE Mr. Verdugo was employed with them– BUT ONLY if they had an existing policy, specifically stating that involvement in a sex video (be it gay or hetero) would be grounds for dismissal. What he may or may not have done PRIOR TO his employment with PD is absolutely nobody’s business. Isn’t it illegal IN EVERY STATE for PD officers to be on the take? Be corrupt? Have drinking problems? Beat on their wives? Be physically aggressive with people in general? Aren’t these all grounds for dismissal? How many PD have crossed THOSE lines, time and again, and gotten away with it. No matter WHAT they say– they’re doing this ONLY because he is gay. I wonder how many of Mikey’s fellow officers salivate, now, when they think of him! After all…there are TONS of closeted P.O.’s )